🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be slashed by more than half, following a controversial law change that forced local governments to put the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations often spent years building community backing and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” approaches, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.